Sig Adamant P320 Is Safe

Instead they blame everyone else, calling it lies for money or anti-gun propaganda

For the love of God, Sig Sauer just cannot do the right thing when it comes to the P320. I am not sure what prompted their social media posts today claiming there is nothing wrong with the Sig P320, but today they went full ham.

They continue to claim there is nothing wrong with the gun, quite adamantly in fact.

Ignore the fact that they recalled them all early on because they were firing when dropped, even though they said they weren’t. But they fixed that, even though it was not an issue.

Then people started reporting that the guns were firing on their own, while holstered. In response, Sig denied it.

Then videos started showing up of it happening – holstered guns going off all on the own when bumped. Lots of videos, from all around the country. Cops, regular folks, even a competition shooter.

Sig continues to deny it. Instead they started blaming the users claiming the guns were not properly holstered.

Except the videos clearly show the guns were in fact holstered with the retention on the holsters secured.

Sig continues to deny it, and changes their approach. Their new plan is to blame the holsters.

You know, because Safariland holsters are a bad design. So bad that nearly every law enforcement agency in the US uses them, and so does a large portion of the US military.

Oddly enough, we are not hearing reports of any other gun randomly discharging while holstered in the very same holsters in which the Sig is discharging all on its own.

It has gotten so bad, some Police Academies have banned the P320 from their ranges.

Ironically, one of my coworkers at the gun store was a Navy corpsman and was assigned to a couple different Marine units during his time in the military. He personally witnessed a Sig P320 discharge while holstered when a couple of guys were goofing around and the butt of the gun got kicked while it was in the holster.

I have made two videos in the past discussing this issue. In response, I have been called all sorts of names.

I have no skin in this game. I do not work for Sig, nor any other gun manufacturer. I am not part of the anti-gun propaganda machine. I get no monetary benefit from speaking negatively about the P320.

Sig has paid out millions to people who have sued them over the P320 firing while holstered, yet Sig continues to claim that there is nothing wrong with the gun.

Sadly, lots of people with bullet holes in them disagree.

I guarantee there will be people responding to this saying they own one and it has never fired on its own. Congratulations, that proves absolutely nothing.

I have owned six Subarus over the last 25 years, and we currently have three in our stable. Exactly none of my Subarus ever developed a head gasket leak. That does not negate the fact that Subaru has a well known issue with head gaskets leaking.

I am not a Sig hater. I carried a Sig for half of my career. I personally own three Sig handguns and have no concerns about any of them. However, to be perfectly honest, the way Sig is treating this situation is likely to turn me into Sig hater.

As a side note to Sig, claiming something as fact does not actually make it a fact.

The ACLU recently tried doing something similar. Doing so proves nothing, and just makes you look silly when there is ample evidence to the contrary.